Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41864990›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2026

Pathways to care among women hospitalized with severe abortion complications in Bangui, Central African Republic, a conflict-affected urban setting: qualitative results of the AMoCo (abortion-related morbidity and mortality in conflict-affected and fragile settings) study.

Tamara Fetters, Pascale Lissouba, Catrin Schulte-Hillen, Daphné Lagrou, Ann M Moore, Marietta Claudia Adame Gbanzi, Richard Ngbale, Bill Powell, Claire Fotheringham, Onikepe Owolabi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tamara FettersIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. fetterst@ipas.org.
Pascale LissoubaEpicentre, Paris, France.
Catrin Schulte-HillenMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Brussels, Belgium.
Daphné LagrouMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Brussels, Belgium.
Ann M MooreGuttmacher Institute, New York City, NY, USA.
Marietta Claudia Adame GbanziMinistère de La Santé, Bangui, Central African Republic.
Richard NgbaleMinistère de La Santé, Bangui, Central African Republic.
Bill PowellIpas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Claire FotheringhamMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Sydney, Australia.
Onikepe OwolabiMinistère de La Santé, Bangui, Central African Republic.
Huiwu ChenEpicentre, Paris, France.
Timothy WilliamsEpicentre, Paris, France.
Elisabeth PouletEpicentre, Paris, France.
Estelle PasquierEpicentre, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Central African Republic (CAR), a fragile and conflict-affected setting, has one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in the world. Complications of unsafe abortion, while preventable, are one of the major contributors. Legal abortion is authorized in limited circumstances before eight weeks but in practice, is unavailable. This study explored the experiences of patients hospitalized with severe postabortion complications at a Ministry of Health (MoH) maternity hospital supported by Médecins sans Frontières to understand women's challenges accessing appropriate care.

methodsWe interviewed 18 purposively selected girls and women following medical treatment for near-miss or potentially life-threatening abortion complications. In-depth interviews were conducted to understand women's challenges accessing appropriate care. Data were analysed thematically to identify patterns in decisions, care-seeking trajectories, and factors that may have delayed seeking and receiving postabortion care.

resultsAbout two-thirds of participants reported that they had induced the abortion, either on their own or with assistance, before seeking postabortion care. Participants faced multiple barriers accessing abortion which led them to choose ineffective and harmful abortion methods, notably a lack of reliable information and access to safe abortion care services, compounded by individual, interpersonal and socio-economic constraints. When experiencing postabortion complications, the decision to seek care was delayed by limited knowledge and attempts at maintaining secrecy surrounding the abortion. Participants, including those not reporting induced abortion, described complex nonlinear care-seeking pathways, including attempts to self-manage symptoms and consulting closer health care facilities that weren't able to handle the complications due to lack of capacity. Postabortion complications were associated with taxing and potentially long-term physical, psychological, social and financial consequences, which often negatively impacted women, families and communities.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the urgent need for MoH and partners to implement strategies improving timely access to high-quality postabortion care, such as informing communities about danger signs of abortion complications, treatment locations, improving referral systems, and reducing financial barriers. Training informal and lower-level medical staff in the recognition and treatment of abortion complications and about respectful non-judgmental communication with patients would also be of benefit. Furthermore, creating a more supportive environment for the provision of postabortion and safe abortion care and information should be prioritized, including the decentralisation of care to primary care facilities.

Indexed as

AbortionAbortion pathwaysCentral African RepublicMSFNear-miss morbidityPostabortion carePostabortion complications

Identifiers

PMID41864990
PMCPMC13130683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.