ArticleJournal of medical case reports2026
Primary splenic pregnancy: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbdominal pregnancy refers to the implantation of a fertilized egg in the abdominal cavity outside of the uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries; splenic pregnancy is a rare type of abdominal pregnancy. CASE PRESENTATION: Our patient was a 24-year-old Han Chinese female individual who presented to our hospital with left lower abdominal pain for 12 days. The patient complained of 59 days of amenorrhoea and a small amount of vaginal bleeding 2 weeks earlier, and had previously undergone tubal recanalization for "bilateral tubal obstruction." There was no other significant medical history. The patient's serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin level of 20,447 IU/L was significantly higher than normal, but repeated ultrasound examinations did not reveal a gestational sac in the uterine cavity. Therefore, the patient was highly suspected to have an ectopic pregnancy. An abdominal ultrasound scan was performed to clarify the diagnosis, and an irregular, slightly hyperechoic area was found in the spleen, which led to the diagnosis of splenic pregnancy. Postoperative pathology confirmed a splenic pregnancy.
conclusionSplenic pregnancy is difficult to diagnose owing to the lack of typical clinical manifestations. Expanded ultrasound scanning or computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging can help to detect ectopic pregnancy lesions, and laparoscopic exploration can be performed when necessary in patients who cannot be definitively diagnosed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.