SynthesisHead & face medicine2026
Effect of Kinesio Taping on pain, swelling and trismus after third molar surgical extraction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Head & face medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKinesio taping (KT) is used after mandibular third-molar surgery, yet its benefits and time course remain uncertain. We evaluated whether KT reduces pain, swelling, and trismus versus no tape.
methodsPRISMA-2020–conform systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420251072421). Seven databases (PubMed, Embase.com, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library) plus grey literature were searched from inception to 19 May 2025. Eligible studies were adult randomized trials (parallel or split-mouth) under local anaesthesia; KT (≥10% stretch) was applied within 1 h of closure. Outcomes were pain on VAS immediately and days 2–7; swelling; maximum inter-incisal opening; rescue-analgesic intake; skin reactions; and global improvement. Effects were pooled as mean differences (MD) or Hedges g standardized mean differences (SMD) using REML random-effects with inverse-variance weighting and Hartung–Knapp; heterogeneity used I². Risk of bias used RoB-2. Publication bias used a 24-h funnel plot, Egger’s test (α=0.10), and trim-and-fill. Sensitivity analyses were leave-one-out. Certainty used GRADE.
resultsThirteen randomized trials (2019–2025; n=646) were included; overall risk of bias was high. Pain favoured KT early: SMD −0.88 (95% CI −1.11 to −0.65) at 24 h and −0.91 (−1.33 to −0.50) at 48 h; at day 4 the reduction was uniform (I²=0%) with MD −1.94 (−2.56 to −1.32). By day 7, pain was small and uncertain: SMD −0.66 (−1.48 to 0.15; I²=93%). Swelling showed a small week-one benefit: SMD −0.42 (−0.75 to −0.09; I²=46%). Trismus improved mid-week in single studies (day-4 MD 13.60 mm [10.46 to 16.74]; day-5 MD 5.00 mm [2.56 to 7.44]); pooled day-7 SMD 0.42 (−0.19 to 1.02; I²=83%). Egger’s tests were non-significant except trismus at 2 days (p=0.0003); trim-and-fill imputed zero studies. Early pain findings were robust to leave-one-out. GRADE rated day-7 pain, swelling, and trismus as very low certainty. DISCUSSION: KT yields large early analgesia, a small week-one swelling reduction, and mid-week opening gains chiefly from single studies; interpretation is limited by high bias risk, heterogeneity, variable measurement, and ≤7-day follow-up.
conclusionsKT may be offered as an adjunct for early symptom control after third-molar extraction; by day 7 effects are small and uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.