ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Assessment process followed by elementary school teachers in Japan for assessing the support needs of children of parents with cancer: a semi-structured interview.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsChildren of parents with cancer are often affected physically, psychologically, and socially. School teachers are close observers of children’s behavior and emotional stability. Their awareness and judgment are crucial for detecting changes early and linking children to appropriate support. However, the role of school teachers in recognizing these signs and the process by which they determine the need for support remain largely unexplored, particularly in Japan.This study aimed to identify the process by which elementary school teachers in Japan assess the support needs of children whose parents have cancer. The findings of this study contribute to the development of school-based support systems for these children.
methodsA descriptive phenomenological design was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with public elementary school teachers in Akita City. The interview guide covered three main areas: (1) situations in which teachers perceived a need for support, (2) the reasons and contextual factors underlying such judgments, and (3) how teachers interpreted subtle signs and behavioral changes in children. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step descriptive phenomenological method to clarify the essential structure of teachers’ decision-making experiences.
resultInterviews with 24 teachers (conducted between December 2024 and June 2025) revealed four thematic categories: (1) Noticing changes in children, (2) Interpreting those changes and experiencing wavering judgments, (3) Regulating emotional conflicts that hinder offering support; and (4) Recognizing and reaffirming their role as educators in providing support. Taken together, these categories depict a progressively negotiated decision-making structure in which teachers move from intuitive noticing to reflective interpretation and role-based action. The findings clarify that support-related judgments are shaped by ethical hesitation, uncertainty, and gradual consolidation of professional responsibility rather than immediate assessment.
conclusionThe complexity of decision-making in schools regarding support for children of parents with cancer highlights the need for close collaboration with health care professions. Observations and insights gained by teachers through daily interactions can be valuable for the entire health care team, and such collaborations can enhance support quality. Therefore, developing interprofessional systems and educational initiatives that foster mutual understanding of professional roles may enhance timely and comprehensive support for these children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.