ArticleVirology journal2026
A Standardized workflow for Orthohantavirus production, detection, and antiviral screening.
Article in Virology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficient lentivirus concentration using a tabletop centrifuge.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthohantaviruses are zoonotic RNA viruses that cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome. Their slow replication, lack of cytopathic effects, and variable biosafety requirements have long hindered the standardization of infection assays and antiviral testing. While serological and pseudotype-based systems enable high-throughput screening, scalable assays that directly quantify full-cycle Orthohantavirus infection remain limited.
resultsHere, we present a modular BSL-2 workflow that integrates standardized virus stock generation with complementary infection-quantification readouts. The platform combines (i) titration-guided pooling of daily supernatants to produce high-titer virus stocks without ultracentrifugation, (ii) a cross-reactive monoclonal antibody recognizing conserved nucleocapsid epitopes across multiple Orthohantavirus species, and (iii) three quantitative detection methods: qPCR, in-cell ELISA, and intracellular flow cytometry. Flow cytometry was used as the primary readout because it enables rapid, quantitative, single-cell detection of infection and can be readily integrated with multiparametric analyses. Using this system, we quantified the antiviral effects of rottlerin and observed distinct dose‒response profiles among Puumala, Tula, and Prospect Hill viruses.
conclusionOur workflow delivers a practical, reproducible, and scalable toolkit for comparative Orthohantavirus studies, enabling quantitative infection analysis and small-molecule testing under standard laboratory conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.