SynthesisBMC geriatrics2026
Digital health interventions for older adults with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSubjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment represent critical windows for intervention as early stages of dementia progression. Although digital health interventions have shown potential in enhancing cognitive performance and slowing cognitive decline, their clinical efficacy remains a subject of debate. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of digital health interventions on cognition, emotion, functional ability, and quality of life in older adults with SCD and MCI.
methodsWe searched five databases for randomized controlled trials published until August 2025. Eligible studies involved adults aged 60 years or older with SCD or MCI receiving a digital health intervention versus usual care or conventional non-digital interventions. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models.
resultsFifteen trials (N = 829) were included. The meta-analysis showed that digital health interventions significantly improved cognitive function (SMD = 0.387, 95% CI: 0.052–0.723; I2 = 66%) and functional ability (MD = 1.364, 95% CI: 0.937–1.790, I2 = 0.0%). However, no significant effects were observed for emotional status (SMD = -0.192, 95% CI: -0.405–0.021, I2 = 0.0%) or quality of life (MD = -0.660, 95% CI:-2.730–1.409, I2 = 0.0%). The small number of studies limited quantitative synthesis for specific cognitive domains.
conclusionDigital health interventions had been shown to improve global cognitive function and functional ability in older adults with SCD or MCI, but they did not appear to significantly affect emotional status or quality of life. However, these findings are based on evidence of limited methodological quality, and the results should be interpreted with caution. Further high-quality clinical trials are needed to confirm these effects and to clarify potential domain-specific cognitive benefits of digital health interventions.
trial registrationProspero Number: CRD420251155249.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.