Trial reportBMC medical education2026
Effectiveness of situational simulation and case-based learning in pediatric intern cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a pilot study.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application Status and Intelligent Development Prospects of Case-Based Learning in Standardized Training for Obstetric Residents: A Narrative Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivespediatric Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is critical for saving children who experience cardiac arrest, but traditional teaching is often ineffective at improving clinical competence and teamwork. This study evaluates an innovative, understudied model: situational simulation combined with case-based learning (CBL) in CPR training among pediatric intern.
methodsThis randomized controlled pilot study involved 100 pediatric interns from an academic teaching hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to either the traditional teaching group or the new teaching model group (i.e., situational simulation with CBL). Semi-structured interviews were conducted and recorded among students participating in the situational simulation with CBL. Data collection continued until data saturation was achieved. The collected data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis method within the constructivist paradigm. Two researchers independently coded transcripts using NVivo 12.0, identified themes iteratively, and ensured rigour through member checking.
resultsThe situational simulation with CBL approach produced significant improvements in clinical operation scores: hands-on CPR (79.56 ± 6.04 vs. 94.20 ± 4.17) and bag-valve-mask ventilation (81.14 ± 6.33 vs. 93.47 ± 3.57) (P < 0.05). For the qualitative component, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 participants, and analysis identified 9 core themes grouped into four clusters: "social interactive construction of knowledge," "contextualized construction of knowledge," "active construction of knowledge," and "cultivation of clinical core competencies and professional qualities."
conclusionsThe adoption of situational simulation combined with CBL approach can enhance the teaching effectiveness for pediatric interns and improve their overall clinical emergency response capabilities. Consequently, it offers an innovative teaching methodology for CPR training of pediatric interns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.