ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2026
Recent postglacial population expansions may explain a surprising lack of lineage splitting in Arctic meiobenthic flatworms.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeiobenthic metazoans often showcase a puzzling combination of poor dispersal capabilities and wide geographical distributions. Because meiofauna ‘should’ be prone to endemism, the surprising observation of widely distributed morphospecies has spurred substantial interest and explanatory attempts. We place the searchlight on two small flatworm species – Itaspiella helgolandica and Notocaryoplana arctica – which are particularly restricted in habitat preferences and dispersal capabilities but which occur across the Arctic. Two hypotheses which could account for their wide distributions are explored: (1) populations are genetically divergent but showcase morphological stasis in an instance of cryptic speciation and (2) postglacial population expansion occurred recently enough that genetic drift and local adaptation has not produced divergent allopatric clades yet.
resultsWe observed consistent gross and copulatory stylet morphology across local and global scales, confirming the general lack of morphological differences noted by other authors. Our phylogenetic analyses and species delimitation test (bPTP) of partial ribosomal gene sequences (28 S and 18 S rDNA) support the monophyly of each species, with no apparent signs of nascent allopatric lineage splitting. Likewise, haplotype networks do not indicate geography-derived clustering of populations but rather point toward interconnectivity across global and local scales. While our sample sizes and the genetic markers included limit the interpretations of the study, the star-like shapes of the haplotype networks together with negative Tajima’s D and significant, negative Fu’s Fs test values strongly point toward a history of recent population expansions in the studied flatworms.
conclusionsWe find strong support for postglacial population expansions as the most parsimonious explanation for the observed morphological similarities and a weakening of competing hypotheses, e.g. that of widespread cryptic speciation. We note that both species may still be dispersing over long distances e.g. through drifting of egg capsules, and our findings carry important implications for phylogeographical studies of meiobenthic invertebrates and the associated ‘meiofauna paradox’.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.