ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Multi-trait stability selection drives genetic gains in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] under high-temperature stress.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) is a crucial food and fodder crop in regions characterised by high temperatures. However, its reproductive stages are particularly sensitive to heat stress, leading to reduced pollen viability, pod set, and yield. Therefore, developing and deploying high-temperature-tolerant cultivars is crucial for maintaining productivity under changing climatic conditions.
methodsA total of 250 diverse cowpea accessions, along with five checks, were evaluated at Baramati and Jodhpur during the 2022–2023 growing season under both normal and late sowing conditions to simulate high-temperature stress. Growth, yield, and physiological traits, including canopy temperature, were measured. Multi-trait stability indices, including the multi-trait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI), the multi-trait stability index (MTSI), the multi-trait mean performance and stability index (MTMPS), Mean Performance and Stability (MPS) analysis and the factor analysis-based BLUP index (FAI-BLUP), were utilised to identify superior genotypes. Further, genetic parameters were also estimated using mixed linear models.
resultsLate sowing exposed genotypes to temperatures exceeding 35 °C during flowering, inducing severe reproductive stress; only 147 of 250 accessions successfully flowered and set seeds. Traits such as seed yield, pods per plant, and seeds per pod showed high heritability (≥ 60%) and considerable genetic variation, while canopy temperature exhibited lower variability. Grain yield was positively correlated with pods per plant (r = 0.40) and grains per pod (r = 0.36), and negatively correlated with canopy temperature (r = − 0.35). Multi-trait indices identified 29 superior genotypes, with six [G044 (IC488270), G078 (EC240920), G080 (IC488085), G112 (EC240868), G114 (EC243927), G142 (IC402161)] consistently selected across all models. Predicted selection gains were high for grain yield (+ 18.7%), pods per plant (+ 11.2%), and grains per pod (+ 8.5%). Several genotypes [G066 (EC240878), G080 (IC488085), G112 (EC240868)] demonstrated both high yield and stability across environments.
conclusionsThis study reveals substantial genetic variation for high-temperature tolerance in cowpea, highlighting the value of integrating multi-environment phenotyping with multi-trait stability indices for robust selection. The identified genotypes provide immediate candidates for cultivar release and represent valuable genetic resources for breeding programs aiming to develop heat-resilient cowpea varieties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.