Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41864591›Full record

ArticleJournal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation2026

Machine Learning Approaches to Predict 24-Hour Urine Collection Results Based on Self-Reported Beverage Intake.

Shiyu Li, Necole Streeper, Nilàm Ram, Jamie Zoellner, Kristina Penniston, David E Conroy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shiyu LiSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Necole StreeperDepartment of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Nilàm RamDepartment of Psychology and Department of Communication, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Jamie ZoellnerDepartment of Communication, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Kristina PennistonDepartment of Urology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
David E ConroySchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: deconroy@umich.edu.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Efficacy of sipIT Intervention for Increasing Urine Output in Patients with UrolithiasisR01DK124469 · NIDDK · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI CONROY, DAVID E., STREEPER, NECOLE · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
A novel use of web-based software to efficiently triage pre-surgical patients basR44TR000045 · NCATS · MEDSLEUTH, INC. · PI KALAMAS, ALICIA GRUBER · 2012 to 2012
$546k
NCATS NIH HHS R44 TR000045NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK124469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRepeated 24-hour urine (24HU) collections are used to evaluate risk factors for recurrence of kidney stones but are costly and burdensome. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to predict 24HU volume from patients' self-reported beverage intake and classify compliance with guidelines for preventing kidney stone recurrence. DESIGN AND

methodsData were extracted from 2 clinical trials: trial 1 (development dataset: n = 380) and trial 2 (validation dataset: n = 142). Regression models (linear regression, regression trees, random forest, and support vector machine) were trained to predict continuous 24HU volume, while classification models (logistic regression, classification trees, random forest, and support vector machine) were trained to predict low urine volume (<2 L).

resultsNo differences were found between the development and validation datasets on demographic characteristics, 24HU volume, or self-reported beverage intake. Random forest model performed the best in predicting 24HU volume on both training and external validation datasets. Random forest also excelled at predicting high urine output in the development dataset but with overfitting risks. All classification models had high negative predictive values, reliably identifying individuals with low urine volume.

conclusionsMachine learning models based on self-reported beverage intake and demographic characteristics can predict 24HU volume in kidney stone patients. They reliably identified patients with ≥2 L/day urine output but perform poorly for identifying those with low output volumes. Additional inputs should be considered to improve prediction and help identify patients who would benefit from targeting fluid intake for stone prevention.

Indexed as

BeveragesKidney CalculiMachine LearningSelf ReportUrine Specimen CollectionAdultClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRisk Factorsbeverageshealth risk behaviorsmachine learningnephrolithiasisself-report

Identifiers

PMID41864591
PMCPMC13245822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.