Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41864542›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of clinical nutrition2026

Methodological standards for body composition assessment-an expert-endorsed guide for research and clinical applications: bioimpedance, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computerized tomography, and ultrasound methods.

Carla M Prado, M Cristina Gonzalez, Kristina Norman, Camila E Orsso, Rocco Barazzoni, Tommy Cederholm, Charlene Compher, Gordon L Jensen, Takashi Abe, Thiago Gonzalez Barbosa-Silva and 19 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Carla M PradoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. Electronic address: carla.prado@ualberta.ca.
M Cristina GonzalezPostgraduate Program in Nutrition and Food, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Kristina NormanDepartment of Geriatrics, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Nutrition and Gerontology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rebrücke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Camila E OrssoDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Rocco BarazzoniDepartment of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara, Trieste, Italy.
Tommy CederholmDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Theme Inflammation and Ageing, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charlene CompherDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Science, University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Gordon L JensenDean's Office and Department of Medicine, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, United States.
Takashi AbeInstitute of Health and Sports Science & Medicine, Graduate School of Health and Sports Science, Juntendo University, Chiba, Japan.
Thiago Gonzalez Barbosa-SilvaDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jonathan P BennettDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Owen T CarmichaelPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
Carrie P EarthmanDepartment of Health Behavior and Nutrition Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States.
William J EvansDepartment of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States; Division of Geriatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
David A FieldsDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States.
Laurence GentonClinical Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Houchun Harry HuDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
Murat KaraDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Jennifer L Miles-ChanHuman Nutrition Unit, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Marina MourtzakisDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Michael T ParisSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, TO, Canada.
Stany PerkisasUniversity Center for Geriatrics, University of Antwerp/ZNA (Ziekenhuis aan de Stroom), Antwerp, Belgium.
Luís B SardinhaExercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, Portugal.
John A ShepherdDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Mario SiervoSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Curtin Dementia Centre of Excellence, enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Boyd Jg StraussDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Yosuke YamadaGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan; Department of Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Shankuan ZhuChronic Disease Research Institute, The Children's Hospital, and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China; Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Steven B HeymsfieldPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, LA, United States. Electronic address: steven.heymsfield@pbrc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of body composition has long been a fundamental component of research and is gaining increasing adoption in clinical practice. This growing interest has drawn new professionals to the field and increased emphasis on its clinical relevance and applications. However, the diversity of assessment techniques and inconsistent terminology create challenges, highlighting the urgent need for harmonized approaches across research and healthcare settings. Commonly employed methods include bioelectrical impedance approaches, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and computerized tomography, with ultrasound emerging as an increasingly prominent tool. These methods are featured in guidelines for diagnosing conditions such as low muscle mass, malnutrition, sarcopenia, and sarcopenic obesity, among others. This second narrative review in a series, developed by an international panel of experts, focuses on these widely accessible assessment tools that align with clinical recommendations. It presents foundational knowledge, discusses validity and reliability considerations, and offers practical advice on terminology, measurement protocols, data interpretation, and longitudinal monitoring. The report also addresses current limitations and identifies areas needing further research. Our goal is to provide clear, evidence-based guidance that is useful for both experienced practitioners and those newly engaging with body composition assessment. We urge organizations, journals, and stakeholders across the body composition field to adopt the proposed principles and standards to support consistency, transparency, and scientific rigor in both research and clinical care.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonBody CompositionElectric ImpedanceTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansObesityReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyadipose tissuebody compositionfat-free massfat masslean soft tissuemeasurement protocolmethodsskeletal muscleterminologyvalidity

Identifiers

PMID41864542
PMCPMC13197919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.