ArticleEBioMedicine2026
Large-scale profiling of blood microbial signatures in patients with Parkinson's disease and its association with disease progression: a cross-sectional study.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmerging evidence supports the presence of microbial signatures in the blood, yet their clinical relevance remains poorly understood. In this study, we profiled blood microbial signatures in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and investigated their associations with disease progression.
methodsWe analysed 4018 whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data of blood samples from two independent cohorts. The high-quality non-human reads were extracted for microbial annotation using Kraken 2 and Bracken software with the PlusPF database. To identify PD-associated signatures, we implemented a population-based, cross-cohort filtration process with resequencing validation to minimise noise and putative contaminants.
findingsMicrobial DNA signals, predominantly bacterial, were extensively detected in the sequencing data and were more abundant in individuals with PD than in controls. Across the two cohorts, 126 bacterial species were identified as key signatures, nearly two-thirds of which are known to colonise human body sites. Among these, 19 species exhibited increased abundance and higher prevalence in PD, and could serve as features to discriminate effectively patients from controls. Furthermore, several microbial signatures were correlated with more severe clinical manifestations, such as motor dysfunction and cognitive impairment.
interpretationOur findings supported blood microbial signatures as promising biomarkers in PD, although their origin and functional relevance remain to be validated. The analytical framework may facilitate future investigations into the potential clinical implications of blood microbial signatures in disease contexts.
fundingThis work was supported by Hunan Innovative Province Construction Project, National Natural Science Foundation of China, and Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.