ReviewUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Effect of ultrasonic treatment on structure and physicochemical properties of starch: An updated review.
Review in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering Slowly Digestible Starch via Physical and Enzymatic Modification: Structural Mechanisms of Formation.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review systematically summarizes the effects of ultrasound on the multi-scale structure and physicochemical properties of starch. Ultrasonic treatment can affect the fine structure, short-range and long-range ordered structures and granule structure of starch through mechanical forces, cavitation effects and accompanying thermal effects. These structure alterations collectively lead to significant changes in starch hydration behavior, pasting viscosity, thermal properties, rheological characteristics and in vitro digestibility. The extent of these effects is highly dependent on ultrasonic parameters including ultrasonic power, treatment time and temperature, as well as the combination of ultrasound with other modification methods (such as microwave processing, pullulanase treatment and alkaline modification). However, the lack of standardized ultrasonic parameters setting has limited the ability to obtain consistent and comparable conclusions. Therefore, the concept of "equivalent cavitation dose (ECD)" was innovatively introduced in this review, which was a quantitative framework integrating ultrasonic power, duty cycle, treatment duration, system temperature and medium physicochemical properties. This concept provides a reference for parameters standardization setting to achieve a more in-depth comparison among different studies. Overall, this review provides a theoretical basis for optimizing ultrasonic modification of starch, guiding the development of starch with tailored structures and functionalities to expand its application in the starch industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.