Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41863846›Full record

Trial reportPacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE2026

In the Search of Noninvasive Methods Delineating Left Bundle Branch Block Amendable With Conduction System Pacing.

Tadej Žlahtič, Vito Starc, David Žižek, Martin Rauber, Bor Antolič, Miha Mrak, Maja Ivanovski, Anja Zupan Mežnar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05155865 (Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac ResYNChronization), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05155865 nacompletednot on this map

Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac ResYNChronization (CSP-SYNC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled62ConditionsDilated Cardiomyopathy with Conduction Defect, Left Bundle-Branch Block, Heart Failure, Resynchronization TherapyArmsResynchronization with conduction system pacing, Cardiac resynchronization therapy with biventricular stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tadej ŽlahtičUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vito StarcFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
David ŽižekUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Martin RauberUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Bor AntoličUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Miha MrakUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja IvanovskiUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anja Zupan MežnarUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTRE LJUBLJANA TP20240255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conduction system pacing (CSP) is an emerging new method of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), however, one third of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) have distal conduction disease, which is not amenable to correction with CSP. There is an emerging need for tailored analysis of ventricular depolarization patterns for patient selection for CRT pacing modality. We retrospectively analyzed 12 lead hrECGs, equivalent dipole (ED) trajectories and standard transthoracic echocardiograms of 18 heart failure patients fulfilling Strauss criteria for LBBB and indication for CRT randomized to the CSP arm of the ongoing CSP-Sync study (NCT05155865). Based on achievement of left bundle branch capture with shortening of left ventricular activation time, 12 patients had proximal LBBB (pLBBB group), and 6 had intact proximal LBBB conduction (dLBBB group) with similar average baseline QRS durations between the groups (179±14 ms in the pLBBB and 165±20 ms in the dLBBB group, p = 0.1). All patients fulfilled the Strauss criteria with no significant difference in the additional criterion (R wave > 0.1 mV in V1; p = 0.7). In the pLBBB group ED trajectory had an initial leftward direction (six vs. zero patients, p = 0.03) with a uniform (12 vs. one patient, p < 0.001) and slower (0.57 ± 0.12 m/s in the pLBBB vs. 0.75 ± 0.15 m/s in the dLBBB group, p = 0.01) velocity. After 6 months the pLBBB group achieved greater relative QRS duration shortening (26% ± 8% vs. 14% ± 9%; p < 0.02) and relative reductions in end left ventricle systolic volumes (41.3% ± 17.6% vs. 15.8% ± 6.1%; p = 0.004) with better improvement in ejection fraction (17.1% ± 11.0% vs. 5.5% ± 1.0%; p = 0.02). The ED trajectories from 12-lead hrECGs could better differentiate patients with proximal or distal LBBB than standard 12-lead ECG alone.

Indexed as

Bundle-Branch BlockCardiac Resynchronization TherapyHeart Conduction SystemAgedEchocardiographyElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective Studies12‐lead electrocardiographybody surface potential mappingcardiac resynchronization therapyconduction system pacingleft bundle branch block

Identifiers

PMID41863846
PMCPMC13331596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.