Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41863831›Full record

ArticlePacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE2026

Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemaker Implants in the Young.

Akshitha Mamidi, Daniel Cortez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akshitha MamidiDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, USA.
Daniel CortezDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionYoung populations with traditional dual-chamber pacemakers are prone to re-intervention compared to their adult populations due to their active lifestyle. AVEIR DR Dual-Chamber Leadless Pacemakers are a new and less invasive approach to traditional pacemakers. Currently, few reports exist to support dual-chamber leadless pacemaker implants in the young.

methodsAVEIR DR dual-chamber leadless pacemakers were implanted in young patients (< 21 years old), at UC Davis Medical Center. Internal jugular vein was the preferred approach for most patients during implantation; however, one patient had a femoral approach after lead extraction.

resultsFive patients received the AVEIR DR dual-chamber leadless pacemaker with a median age of 15 years, and a median weight of 65.8 kg. Access from the internal jugular vein was used in four out of five patients. Median predicted atrial longevity and ventricular longevity were 11.8 and 14.6 years, respectively. Atrial and ventricular impedance, threshold, and pacing were monitored with no complications with a median follow-up of 13 months.

conclusionDual-chamber leadless pacemaker implants are feasible in young patients through femoral and internal jugular vein access.

Indexed as

Pacemaker, ArtificialProsthesis ImplantationAdolescentEquipment DesignFemaleHumansJugular VeinsMaleTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41863831
PMCPMC13542357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.