Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41863818›Full record

ArticleSocial studies of science2026

'Nano Scale [is] Magic Scale': On EPR, Unicorns, and Enchantment in Nanomedicine.

Nicolas Rasmussen, Declan Kuch

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Social studies of science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicolas RasmussenSchool of Humanities, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9498-0921
Declan KuchInstitute for Culture and Society, University of Western Sydney, Penrith, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology is a scientific field where STS scholars have observed the influence of magical thinking. Here we contribute to that literature by describing a phenomenon in the field of drug delivery called the EPR (Enhanced Permeability and Retention) Effect. When the 'nano' boom of the 2000s brought intense interest from outside pharmacology, EPR spawned so many efforts and enterprises in nano-based drug delivery that it became the leading basis for nanomedicine's promise. Following the 2016 failure of a prominent nano-biotech firm exploiting EPR, the collapse of the field offers insights into the role such theories or narratives played in the formation of nanomedicine and, more broadly, how contemporary technoscience may incorporate elements of enchantment-particularly where exposed to financialization.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsNanomedicineNanotechnologyHistory, 20th CenturyBIND therapeuticsbiotechnologydrug deliveryenchantmentfinancializationnanotechnologypharmacologyRobert Langer

Identifiers

PMID41863818
PMCPMC13428072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.