ArticleInfancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
Experience-Sensitive Effects on Temporal Profiles of Social Attention in Early Childhood.
Article in Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experience-Sensitive Effects on Temporal Profiles of Social Attention in Early Childhood.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant StudiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bilinguals show differences in face processing compared to monolinguals, automatically orienting more rapidly to faces and dwelling longer on faces and mouths than monolinguals. However, it is difficult to identify specific visual strategies from average-level data. This pre-registered study uses growth curve analysis within trials to explore individual differences in monolingual and bilingual children's dynamic allocation of visual attention to static faces ("Face Pop-Out") and dynamic mouths ("50 Faces"). Participants were from Greater London in two age groups: 7- to 18-month-olds (n = 131) collected at the Birkbeck Babylab, and 18- to 34-month-olds (n = 745) whose data was publicly available from the Developing Human Connectome Project. Results show that children's attentional trajectories for viewing faces and mouths are sensitive to age and early language environment. Specifically, young bilinguals showed stronger systematic disengagement than monolinguals from faces and mouths after initial orientation. Older bilinguals prioritized the mouth more than monolinguals, driven by a steeper increase in mouth-looking over stimulus time. Age-dependent shifts in attentional allocation over stimulus time were evident within both age groups, particularly in static face viewing. In infants, younger children showed earlier re-fixations to static faces than older children. In toddlers, attention to faces was more stable over stimulus time in older than younger children. Overall, results suggest that age and early exposure to two languages modulates the temporal structure of children's social attention from 7- to 34-months of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.