ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Robotic Surgical Repair of a Parahiatal Hernia: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parahiatal hernias (PHHs) are uncommon diaphragmatic defects that can resemble paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PEHs), resulting in a diagnostic challenge and the potential for inappropriate preoperative surgical planning. Preoperative differentiation of PHH from PEH is difficult due to their anatomic proximity to the esophageal hiatus. This report highlights the importance of intraoperative recognition of PHH and the alteration of the surgical plan. Robotic assistance was used to facilitate visualization and repair of the defect. CASE REPORT A 71-year-old female patient presented with a 3-month history of progressive epigastric pain radiating to the chest and arm, nausea, vomiting, and food intolerance. Imaging suggested a PEH, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair with fundoplication was planned. Intraoperatively, herniation was noted to be through a distinct diaphragmatic defect lateral to the esophageal hiatus, consistent with PHH. The PHH was complicated by a gastric volvulus. Surgical plans were adjusted to correlate with PHH repair, which included adhesiolysis and hernia reduction. A double-layer primary closure without fundoplication or mesh was performed. Recovery was uneventful, with complete symptom resolution at 2 weeks. There was no recurrence at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS PHH should be considered when intraoperative findings deviate from anticipated PEH workup. Robotic-assisted repair offers visualization and dexterity for precise dissection and secure closure. This case supports the safety and feasibility of robotic PHH repair and emphasizes intraoperative recognition to optimize surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.