Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41863787›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026

Robotic Surgical Repair of a Parahiatal Hernia: A Case Report.

Sarah Hughes, Harmanpreet Kakkar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah HughesDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Saint James School of Medicine, Park Ridge, IL, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-7098-0392
Harmanpreet KakkarDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Saint James School of Medicine, Park Ridge, IL, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-5417-6201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Parahiatal hernias (PHHs) are uncommon diaphragmatic defects that can resemble paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PEHs), resulting in a diagnostic challenge and the potential for inappropriate preoperative surgical planning. Preoperative differentiation of PHH from PEH is difficult due to their anatomic proximity to the esophageal hiatus. This report highlights the importance of intraoperative recognition of PHH and the alteration of the surgical plan. Robotic assistance was used to facilitate visualization and repair of the defect. CASE REPORT A 71-year-old female patient presented with a 3-month history of progressive epigastric pain radiating to the chest and arm, nausea, vomiting, and food intolerance. Imaging suggested a PEH, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair with fundoplication was planned. Intraoperatively, herniation was noted to be through a distinct diaphragmatic defect lateral to the esophageal hiatus, consistent with PHH. The PHH was complicated by a gastric volvulus. Surgical plans were adjusted to correlate with PHH repair, which included adhesiolysis and hernia reduction. A double-layer primary closure without fundoplication or mesh was performed. Recovery was uneventful, with complete symptom resolution at 2 weeks. There was no recurrence at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS PHH should be considered when intraoperative findings deviate from anticipated PEH workup. Robotic-assisted repair offers visualization and dexterity for precise dissection and secure closure. This case supports the safety and feasibility of robotic PHH repair and emphasizes intraoperative recognition to optimize surgical management.

Indexed as

Hernia, HiatalHerniorrhaphyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleFundoplicationHumansLaparoscopyStomach Volvulus

Identifiers

PMID41863787
PMCPMC13015114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.