ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
MRI image segmentation of the major lower leg muscles using deep learning: application in biomechanical analysis.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMuscle volume is one of the major morphological parameters determining force and joint torque production capacity. An accurate, automatic muscle segmentation method, using imaging modalities such as Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI), is critical for precise volume measurements thus enhancing the utility of MRI-based quantitative muscle evaluation.
methodsWe developed EdgeUNETR++, an encoder-decoder model based on a transformer architecture that incorporates an edge enhancement module. Our proposed model was applied to on an MRI dataset of major lower leg muscles from both able-bodied and post-stroke participants to extract the muscle volume information. To further assess its potential for use in biomechanical analysis, we evaluated the correlation between the segmented muscle volumes and optimal ankle joint torque.
resultsEdgeUNETR + + achieved segmentation performance comparable to the baseline model, with modest improvements in certain muscles and in boundary-focused metrics. Across all segmentation scenarios, muscle volumes derived from both models were close to the ground truth and exhibited a similar positive trend in their relationship with optimal ankle torque across the four major muscles (i.e., soleus, lateral gastrocnemius, medial gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior).
conclusionIn conclusion, EdgeUNETR + + may serve as an automated and practical tool for lower leg muscle segmentation and volume estimation from MRI, supporting investigations of muscle morphology and related biomechanical analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41863716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.