ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Uncertainty quantification of conduction velocity in models of cardiac spread of activation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study quantified the effect of conduction velocity (CV) variability on cardiac electrical activation patterns, a key factor for cardiac digital twins. We examined how myocardial and endocardial longitudinal, transverse, and sheet CVs influence ventricular activation across multiple pacing sites. Three porcine biventricular heart models, each including a fast-conducting endocardial layer, were used to simulate electrical activation with an eikonal approach. Uncertainty quantification with polynomial chaos expansion systematically varied six CV parameters within physiological ranges. In total, 1,868 simulations from eight ventricular pacing sites were analyzed for activation time, variability, and global sensitivities. Myocardial longitudinal CV showed the greatest influence on activation timing (global sensitivity up to 0.98). Endocardial-layer longitudinal CV was similarly important for endocardial stimuli, while transverse and sheet CVs had minimal effects. Activation-time variability reached 15 ms, increasing with distance from the pacing origin. Longitudinal CVs, particularly myocardial and endocardial-layer, dominate ventricular activation dynamics and should be prioritized when personalizing cardiac digital twins. Accounting for CV uncertainty is essential for accurate prediction and therapy optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41863714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.