Trial reportMolecular neurobiology2026
Lacosamide Versus Propranolol in Episodic Migraine, a Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Trial.
Trial report in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05851781 (Safety and Efficacy of Lacosamide Versus Propranolol in Migraine), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Efficacy of Lacosamide Versus Propranolol in Migraine
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although migraine is the second most prevalent form of headache, its preventive treatment has some contraindications and complications. It has been postulated that lacosamide might inhibit CGRP release in the trigeminal system, which could contribute to migraine management. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide as an alternative medication to propranolol for preventing episodic migraine, especially in patients who cannot tolerate propranolol and approved antiseizure medicines for migraine prevention. We recruited patients with episodic migraines; we had two groups: lacosamide group who received lacosamide 50 mg once daily for 1 week, then twice daily from the 8th day till the 90th day; propranolol group who received propranolol 40 mg twice daily for 1 week, then 80 mg twice daily from the 8th till the 90th day. 574 completed the study. In episodic migraine patients, there was no significant difference in the MMD in the last 4 weeks of treatment compared to baseline, the percentage of patients who achieved > 50% reduction in migraine days, reduction in MMD that required acute medication in the last 4 weeks, reduction in HIT score compared to baseline in both groups with P-values 0.13, 0.22, 0.57, and 0.61 respectively. In episodic migraine patients, the regular use of lacosamide 50 mg Bid for 3 months yielded reductions in the monthly migraine days, migraine days that required acute medications, and HIT6 score comparable to those achieved using propranolol 80mg Bid. Lacosamide was well-tolerated by migraine patients. Trial registration: registered on clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05851781-30/04/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.