ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2026
Pretreatment volume-based
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was conducted to examine relationships of pretreatment volume-based quantitative MATERIALS AND
methodsData for 71 patients with FDG-avid MPeM who underwent pretreatment
resultsEnrolled patients underwent follow-up for a mean period of 27.6 months (range 2.1-161.2 months, median 18.9 months), during which 49 (69.0%) died. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and log-rank testing indicated that those with high SUVmax (≥ 6.9), WB MTV (≥ 60), or WB TLG (≥ 230) had a significantly lower OS rate than patients with a low rate (< 6.9, < 60, < 230; p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, respectively). Univariate analysis of all patients indicated an association of diffuse peritoneal disease form (p = 0.022), high level SUVmax (p = 0.0002), WB MTV (p < 0.0001), or WB TLG (p < 0.0001) level, extra-abdominal metastasis (p = 0.079) and treatment regimen (p = 0.058) with significantly shorter OS. Additionally, multivariate analysis results confirmed high WB MTV as an independent negative predictor (hazard ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 0.72-13.45; p = 0.039).
conclusionsThese findings indicate that pretreatment volume-based quantitative
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.