Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41863655›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

Frailty index as a predictive tool for poor outcomes after ventral hernia repair - systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maria Clara Morais, Guilherme de Carvalho Caldas, Denise Padilha Abs de Almeida, Marina Fração Pereira, Julia Apocalypse, Louise Webster Lima Costa Cruz, Raquel Nogueira, Flavio Malcher, Diego Laurentino Lima

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria Clara MoraisDepartment of Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Guilherme de Carvalho CaldasUniversidade de Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brasil.
Denise Padilha Abs de AlmeidaCentro Universitário Cesmac, Maceió, Brasil.
Marina Fração PereiraPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Julia ApocalypsePontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Louise Webster Lima Costa CruzPontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Raquel NogueiraMontefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Flavio MalcherDepartment of Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Diego Laurentino LimaMontefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. dilaurentino@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-1284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrailty, characterized by reduced physiologic reserve and heightened vulnerability to surgical stress, has emerged as a key predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes. The modified 5-factor frailty index (mFI-5) offers a simplified yet validated tool for quantifying frailty. While its predictive utility is established in multiple surgical specialties, its role in ventral hernia repair (VHR) has not been comprehensively synthesized. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical utility and discriminative performance of the mFI-5 in VHR by analyzing postoperative outcome patterns among frail and non-frail patients.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, the authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane databases from inception up to April 2025. Adult patients undergoing elective VHR were included if outcomes were stratified by mFI-5 frailty status. Data on demographics, hernia characteristics, complications, readmissions, reoperations, length of stay (LOS), and mortality were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses assessed pooled risk ratios (RR) for key outcomes. Study quality and risk of bias were evaluated using ROBINS-I.

resultsFour studies were included in the final analysis, representing 27,312 patients (17,760 non/pre-frail, 9,552 frail/severely frail). Frail patients were older, more comorbid, and more likely to have larger hernias. Meta-analysis demonstrated that frailty was significantly associated with higher 30-day reoperation (RR 1.55; 95% CI 1.22–1.99; p < 0.001). Although absolute mortality rates were low (< 1%) in both groups, the reduction observed in non/pre-frail patients remains clinically relevant in the setting of elective benign surgery. No significant differences were found in pooled rates of surgical site infections or readmissions. Recurrence was only reported in the studies when it was a cause of 30-day reoperation.

conclusionThe mFI-5 is a pragmatic and validated tool for stratifying physiologic risk in ventral hernia repair. Even small absolute reductions in postoperative mortality are clinically meaningful in a benign elective operation, underscoring the value of frailty assessment for patient selection and perioperative counseling. Incorporating frailty screening into routine practice may support safer and more personalized hernia care. Future research should refine composite risk models and test interventions to mitigate frailty-related risk while preserving the functional benefits of repair.

Indexed as

FrailtyHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyPostoperative ComplicationsHumansLength of StayReoperationFrailty indexSystematic reviewVentral hernia repair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.