ArticleBrain structure & function2026
Optimizing exercise for brain health: cortical activation and connectivity across different exercise modalities.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exercise is a cost-effective, low-risk strategy with significant health benefits, including improved brain function and cognitive abilities. The study aims to investigate the impact of different exercise modalities and performance on brain function, with the fNIRS method being used to assess cortical activation and connectivity in brain regions of healthy adults. We used fNIRS to measure the effects of six types of exercise—level walking, weighted walking, going up and down slopes (GSL), going up and down stairs (GST), running, and jumping jack—on brain regions related to motor and cognitive functions. Jumping jack and running were most effective in activating brain areas associated with motor and cognitive functions compared to other exercise types. Specifically, the activation level of the left primary somatosensory cortex during jumping jack was significantly higher than during GST (mean difference = 1.20 × 10− 6, 95% CI [3.82 × 10− 7, 2.02 × 10− 6], Cohen’s d = 0.74, pooled SD = 1.63 × 10− 6; PFDR = 0.02), and activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was also significantly higher than during GSL (mean difference = 8.80 × 10− 7, 95% CI [2.68 × 10− 7, 1.49 × 10− 6], Cohen’s d = 0.83, pooled SD = 1.06 × 10− 6; PFDR = 0.03). This study is the first to elucidate the effects of different exercise types on brain function, particularly the advantages of jumping jack and running in terms of brain activation. The findings provide valuable insights for developing exercise strategies that optimize brain health and enhance the overall benefits of these common activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41863635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.