ArticleBrain structure & function2026
Mapping Fos-immunoreactive neurons activated by intra-oral infusion of quinine, sucrose or water throughout the brain of B6 mice.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fos immunohistochemistry was used to identify neurons in taste-related brain areas throughout the B6 mouse brain activated by intra-oral (IO) infusion of 3.0 mM quinine hydrochloride (Q), 1.0 M sucrose (S) or filtered water (W). IO infusion of Q and S elicited more Fos-immunoreactive (Fos-IR) neurons than W in the central medial (CM) and dorsomedial (DM) subareas of the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) and the central medial (CeM) amygdala (ps < 0.05). Infusion of Q led to more Fos expression than W in the central lateral (CL) PBN and the parvocellular reticular formation (PCRT; ps < 0.05). The only area where IO infusion of Q and S elicited a different number of Fos-IR neurons was the PCRT which responded more to Q (p < 0.05). Cluster analysis of the number of Fos-IR neurons in all 29 taste-related nuclei and subareas examined revealed that populations of neurons distributed among these brain regions respond best to Q, S or both Q and S. Specifically, the Q-best cluster included more posterior structures like the nucleus of the solitary tract, RT and part of the PBN. The S-best cluster included more anterior structures like the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, nucleus accumbens and orbitofrontal cortex. And, the cluster of areas that responded better to Q and S than W included the amygdala, gustatory and piriform cortices and a few PBN subareas. Therefore, the data suggest that collections of neurons among taste-responsive brain areas are important for distinguishing Q and S from water as well as identifying the specific tastant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.