ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Post-marketing safety surveillance and adverse event risk factors of abemaciclib: a pharmacoepidemiologic study.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abemaciclib, the first highly selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, is widely used in breast cancer therapy. However, investigations into its adverse drug reactions remain scant. The aim of this study was to perform data mining on adverse events (AEs) associated with abemaciclib and to identify potential risk factors. Using data extracted from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for the period of July 2017 to September 2024, abemaciclib-associated AEs were analyzed for signal detection. The analysis employed four disproportionality algorithms: the reporting odds ratio, the proportional reporting ratio, the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, and the Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. AE signal differences between patients aged 18-64 and ≥ 65 years were compared, with age effects analyzed via univariate logistic regression. A total of 98 AE signals associated with abemaciclib were identified, spanning 15 System Organ Classes. Among these, 21 signals were not explicitly documented in the product label. Additionally, signals like macrocytosis (n = 4) may be statistically unstable due to small sample sizes (n < 5). These findings require validation via large-scale studies and do not yet represent established AEs. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥ 65 years was associated with increased reporting odds for interstitial lung disease and blood creatinine increased. This study highlights the critical need for timely identification and continuous updating of adverse drug reaction information. Heightened vigilance for unlabeled reactions and attention to therapeutic drug monitoring, particularly dose adjustment in older adults, are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41863622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.