SynthesisEuropean radiology2026
Convolutional neural networks in paediatric fracture detection: pooled evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning models for detecting wrist and distal forearm fractures in pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Emergency radiology · 2026Review
- Deep Learning-Based Multi-Class Pediatric Wrist Fracture Subtype Classification: A Pilot Study Comparing Convolutional Neural Network Architectures.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Fracture Detection on Bone Radiographs: The Impact of an AI Tool on Orthopaedic Night Shifts.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Fracture Detection in Orthopedic and Trauma Imaging: Where It Works, Where It Fails, and Principles for Safe Clinical Deployment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Observational
- Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the 100 Most-Cited English-Language Publications.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this review was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) models for detecting paediatric appendicular fractures on plain radiographs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis review followed the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2025. Eligible studies included paediatric patients (< 21 years) where AI models assessed plain radiographs for fractures, using human readers as the reference standard. Primary outcomes were pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (LR
resultsSeventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, with 11 contributing to the meta-analysis (over 10,000 radiographs). Pooled sensitivity was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), and specificity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94), corresponding to a false-positive rate of 0.10. The HSROC curve demonstrated high overall discriminative ability. Subgroup analyses showed comparable diagnostic performance for upper extremity fractures (sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.89) and lower extremity fractures (sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.94). The pooled DOR was 104.6, LR
conclusionAI models, particularly deep learning architectures, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for detecting paediatric appendicular fractures on radiographs, approaching expert-level performance and improving the diagnostic abilities of junior clinicians. However, broader clinical adoption requires robust external validation and prospective integration into clinical workflows. KEY POINTS: Question What is the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models for detecting paediatric appendicular fractures on plain radiographs? Findings AI models showed high diagnostic accuracy for paediatric appendicular fractures, with a pooled sensitivity of 0.92, specificity of 0.90, strong HSROC performance, and consistent results across limb subgroups. Clinical relevance AI-assisted fracture detection may improve diagnostic accuracy, support junior clinicians, and reduce delays in identifying paediatric appendicular fractures, enhancing patient safety and enabling faster, more efficient care pathways in emergency and outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.