ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
LLM-powered prostate cancer staging from PSMA-PET/CT reports using PROMISE v2.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of structured reporting on interpretability of PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer staging-towards standardised clinical implementation.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate staging of prostate cancer is essential for guiding therapy and predicting outcomes. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has become an established modality for disease assessment, and the PROMISE v2 framework provides standardized criteria for molecular imaging–based TNM (miTNM, molecular imaging TNM) classification. This study investigates the potential of large language models (LLMs) to automatically extract PROMISE v2 staging information from PSMA PET/CT reports. We retrospectively analyzed 1,696 reports from first-diagnosis prostate cancer patients using the open-source Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct (in the Q8_0 GGUF quantization) model, deployed securely within institutional infrastructure. Four prompting strategies were systematically compared: Zero-shot, advanced Zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought (CoT). Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and micro- and macro-averaged F1 scores. Advanced Zero-shot prompting achieved the highest performance for local staging (micro-F1 = 0.65), while CoT prompting was superior for nodal (micro-F1 = 0.79) and metastatic staging (micro-F1 = 0.84). Error analyses revealed that Zero-shot approaches tended to collapse predictions into central categories, whereas advanced Zero-shot and CoT prompting yielded more balanced and stage-specific outputs. These findings demonstrate that LLMs can reliably map narrative PET/CT reports onto structured PROMISE v2 staging categories, with prompting strategy strongly influencing performance across staging dimensions. Our results highlight the feasibility of LLM-based workflows for standardizing prostate cancer staging, enabling reproducibility, and supporting large-scale outcome analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.