ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2026
Brain regions beyond the visual cortex are relevant to subjective time prediction from fMRI salient events in a visual naturalistic context.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time perception is an essential part of human experience and can be distorted by features of daily stimuli, causing variations relative to actual time. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that subjective time results from the accumulation of salient events and investigate the neural bases of this perceptual processing, while using a publicly available dataset obtained and analyzed in a previous study. Three approaches were used with fMRI data from participants who watched and estimated the duration of silent videos in an MRI scanner. In the first approach, using a functional parcellation of 360 cortical regions, we showed that salient events in functional networks beyond the visual one also had a significant association with subjective time (normalized bias): the dorsal attention network, the cingulo-opercular network, and the somatomotor network. In the second approach, using an Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) deep learning model, it was not possible to predict normalized bias from fMRI trial-by-trial time series within any functional network. In the last approach, functional connectivity between the 360 cortical regions and within the visual network showed no consistent association with subjective time. The results suggest that regions in additional functional networks may be important for duration quantification in the context of visual stimulation, although the approach based on salient events still requires further validation. Furthermore, features such as functional connectivity and fMRI time-series did not show direct association with the normalized bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.