ArticleJournal of biological dynamics2026
A general analytic approach to predicting the best antibiotic dosing regimen.
Article in Journal of biological dynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining optimal antibiotic dosing strategies is complex. Clinically, some antibiotics work best in continuous low doses, while others require high repeated pulses. However, a rational understanding of the best approach depending on the specific pairing of antibiotics and bacterial species remains unclear. Using mathematical models, we analyze bacterial populations under two strategies-constant concentration and repeated dosing-with fixed pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Our results reveal that the shape of the dose‒response curve, which measures the bacterial net growth rate against the antibiotic concentration, is crucial. Specifically, its concavity determines the best strategy. In cases where the curve exhibits multiple concavities, additional factors, such as the tolerable dosing range, influence the regimen. These findings challenge the universal application of 'hit hard and hit early', as some recommended schedules include lower, constant doses. This work contributes to the literature on rational antibiotic prescription, aiming to minimize antibiotic use and combat antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41863552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.