Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41863552›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological dynamics2026

A general analytic approach to predicting the best antibiotic dosing regimen.

Leah Childers, Pia Abel Zur Wiesch, Jessica M Conway

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological dynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leah ChildersDepartment of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6989-0578
Pia Abel Zur WieschDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9420-9005
Jessica M ConwayDepartment of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1474-4230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining optimal antibiotic dosing strategies is complex. Clinically, some antibiotics work best in continuous low doses, while others require high repeated pulses. However, a rational understanding of the best approach depending on the specific pairing of antibiotics and bacterial species remains unclear. Using mathematical models, we analyze bacterial populations under two strategies-constant concentration and repeated dosing-with fixed pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Our results reveal that the shape of the dose‒response curve, which measures the bacterial net growth rate against the antibiotic concentration, is crucial. Specifically, its concavity determines the best strategy. In cases where the curve exhibits multiple concavities, additional factors, such as the tolerable dosing range, influence the regimen. These findings challenge the universal application of 'hit hard and hit early', as some recommended schedules include lower, constant doses. This work contributes to the literature on rational antibiotic prescription, aiming to minimize antibiotic use and combat antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, BiologicalAnti-Bacterial Agents26A5137N2592C45Antibiotic dosingantimicrobial resistance (AMR)dose‒response curvesmathematical modellingpharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.