ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Adaptive mediolateral control during split-belt walking: Energetics of interlimb coordination and enhanced savings following acute intermittent hypoxia.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Control of frontal plane mechanics requires active integration of sensory feedback to regulate stability in response to gait perturbations, such as split-belt walking (SBW). In comparison to sagittal plane mechanics, mediolateral (ML) kinematic and kinetic adaptations to split-belt perturbations are less extensively reported. Moreover, the associated metabolic cost of ML adaptations and the retention of previously learned adaptations, defined as motor savings, have not been examined concurrently. We investigated bilateral adaptations in step width and peak ML ground reaction forces to an initial SBW and metabolic cost. We also examined the retention of these adaptations during a subsequent SBW (adapt 2). Given evidence that priming the nervous system with acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) enhances motor adaptation, we compared the magnitude of these adaptations after AIH. Legs on the fast and slow belt increased step width during initial SBW, but the magnitude of width reduced during adapt 2. Distinct kinetic modulation patterns emerged between legs as the initial increase in ML ground reaction forces was attenuated for the slow leg during the braking impulse phase and for the fast leg during the propulsive impulse phase. Metabolic cost reductions were positively associated with adaptations in ML force but not step width. During adapt 2, individuals who received AIH demonstrated greater reductions in step width and ML ground reaction forces during propulsion, suggesting enhanced motor savings. These asymmetrical ML kinetic adaptations contribute to stability and reduced metabolic cost during SBW. These insights might inform the design of training approaches to improve stability in clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.