ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2026
A Physiological Microfluidic Blood-Brain-Barrier Model for In Vitro Study of Nanoparticle Trafficking and Accumulation.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering Small Extracellular Vesicles for Colon-Targeted Delivery: Microenvironment-Responsive Design, Therapeutic Mechanisms, and Clinical Translation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the blood-brain barrier (BBB) restricts passage of most molecules, various naturally occurring and synthetic nanoparticles (NPs) are nonetheless found within the brain parenchyma. To study the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, we developed a microfluidic BBB model (mBBB) using human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells (HCMECs) in direct contact with primary human astrocytes and pericytes within a physiologically relevant extracellular matrix. The horizontal architecture enables high-resolution imaging across the full barrier interface and allows direct assessment of nanoparticle transport and accumulation. This in vitro platform recapitulates key features of the BBB, including selective permeability, junctional protein expression, and receptor-mediated uptake pathways. Using this system, the trafficking and accumulation of structurally distinct nanoparticles, including liposomes, nanoplastics, and extracellular vesicles (EVs), were compared. Among these, heterologous EVs exhibit the highest transport efficiency. Analysis of nanoparticle properties suggest that ligand presentation and membrane composition, rather than size or stiffness, primarily govern BBB penetration. The mBBB platform provides a high-throughput, imaging-based framework to systematically interrogate nanoparticle trafficking across the BBB and offers a translational tool for both drug delivery and neurotoxicity screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.