ArticleCurrent pharmaceutical design2026
Self-Medication as a Type of Nonadherence in Cardiac Patients Over 50 Years of Age.
Article in Current pharmaceutical design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-medication is widely discussed regarding over-the-counter pharmaceutical drugs, as well as some prescription drugs, especially antibiotics. There are virtually no studies on selfmedication with cardiovascular drugs.
objectiveTo assess the prevalence of self-medication and adherence to prescribed treatment in patients with Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD) seeking advice at a cardiology dispensary.
methodsOur cross-sectional study included all patients aged 50 years or older (n=300) who repeatedly visited an outpatient clinic for CVD from December 14, 2023, to August 07, 2024. The information on previously prescribed and actually taken medicinal drugs by the patient was recorded during the visit. Patient-reported adherence was evaluated using a specific scale.
resultsSelf-medication was detected in 120 patients (40%) who either replaced or added drugs to the therapy prescribed by their attending physician. The most common recorded practice was self-prescription of medicinal drugs (106 cases, 88.3%), especially prescription drugs (72 of 106 patients, 67.9%). In 17 patients, self-medication led to inappropriate administration of the drug. In 7 patients (41.2%), self-medication resulted in potentially dangerous combinations of drugs. In 4 patients (23.5%), self-medication resulted in inadequate replacement of the drug, and in 6 patients (35.3%), duplication of drugs was noted. The majority of patients (76.3%) exhibited various violations of compliance with medical recommendations. Among patients practicing self-medication, there were more partially nonadherent patients, and in the subgroup without selfmedication, there were more completely nonadherent patients (p=0.008). DISCUSSION: Self-medication is potentially associated with several risks, including delayed professional consultation, incorrect self-diagnosis, severe adverse reactions, dangerous drug-drug interactions, masking of severe conditions, and the risk of drug abuse. Existing literature predominantly focuses on self-medication with over-the-counter drugs. This study demonstrates that in the Russian Federation, self-medication (including the use of cardiovascular drugs) is remarkably prevalent. More than a third of the surveyed patients independently added new medications to their physician's regimen or substituted prescribed ones. Moreover, more than half of the self-medications were for prescription drugs.
conclusionSelf-medication, as one of the options for nonadherence, was employed by 40% of CVD patients. In some cases, this has led to the emergence of potentially dangerous drug combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41863451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.