ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2026
A Unified Attention-Based Account of Semantic Impairment in Schizophrenia.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and hypothesisPeople with schizophrenia (SCZ) show characteristic impairments in semantic cognition, yet the cognitive mechanisms underlying these patterns remain unclear. Here, we propose a unified mechanistic account in which semantic retrieval is constrained by limitations in internal attention. Specifically, we approximate semantic space as a network of interconnected concepts and posit two attentional control parameters: representational precision (resolution; the ability to distinguish nearby concepts) and the size of the attended field (the subset of semantic space prioritized). We hypothesize that attentional constraints in SCZ reduce precision and/or narrow the attended field, yielding complementary, theoretically predicted patterns of semantic search. STUDY
designWe first constructed a directed semantic graph using a large sample of individuals performing the animal Category Fluency Test (CFT). We then used this network as a normative reference to analyze fluency-derived paths from SCZ and control participants. STUDY
resultsRelative to controls, CFT paths in the SCZ group showed increased reliance on abstract, category-level structure, and reduced exploration radius. These patterns align with compensatory strategies predicted by the proposed mechanism: reliance on coarse-grained structure when resolution is limited, and restriction of traversal when the effective attended field is narrow.
conclusionsThe findings support an attention-constrained retrieval account rather than a stochastic retrieval deficit, indicating that group-level semantic retrieval differences in SCZ may arise from reduced representational resolution and/or a narrowed attended field. These results highlight the value of considering internal attention mechanisms when interpreting semantic impairments in SCZ, with potential connections to attentional phenotypes of ADHD/ADD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.