ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2026
The Social Iowa Gambling Task: a promising tool for assessing deception detection in real-world contexts in adulthood.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDeception detection represents a complex form of social decision making under uncertainty with real-world consequences. Yet reliable tools to identify vulnerability to fraud and exploitation, marked by large individual variability, particularly among older adults, remain limited. Using a short, scalable laboratory task, the Social Iowa Gambling Task (sIGT), we tested whether adaptive social decision making predicts interpersonal and technologically mediated deception detection.
methodsYounger and older adults from a single cohort (Lie Task: N = 153; Deepfake Task: N = 149) completed the sIGT, assessing decision-making in the presence of congruent or incongruent facial trustworthiness cues. Participants judged the veracity of emotional pleas (Lie Task) and face images (Deepfake Task). Deception detection accuracy was analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effects models.
resultsHigher sIGT performance predicted greater lie detection accuracy for deceptive, but not truthful, videos, indicating selective sensitivity to misleading cues. Performance under incongruent facial-cue conditions, requiring resistance to trustworthiness bias, showed a stronger relationship with Lie Task accuracy. For the Deepfake Task, higher sIGT scores were associated with greater discernment of deepfakes from real faces, without moderation by facial-cue condition. For both tasks, predictive effects of sIGT performance were age-invariant. DISCUSSION: Study findings indicate that adaptive social decision-making can predict abilities to detect deception perpetrated through lying and AI-based deepfakes. Results suggest that the ability to adapt under conflicting social cues appears central to resisting lies. As a brief, standardized, and scalable laboratory measure, the sIGT shows promise for identifying individual vulnerability to deception and guiding tailored intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.