ReviewThe Journal of small animal practice2026
Pre-anaesthetic risk assessment and management of dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease: a spectrum of care narrative review.
Review in The Journal of small animal practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myxomatous mitral valve disease, an acquired valvular degeneration, is the most common cardiac disorder in dogs, affecting approximately 10% of dogs in primary care veterinary practice. Dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease frequently require anaesthesia for routine procedures. The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system shows increasing mortality with higher grades, but its subjectivity limits risk stratification in dogs with preclinical myxomatous mitral valve disease. Because Stage B1 and B2 dogs can vary widely in disease severity, even within the same American Society of Anesthesiologists category, a single American Society of Anesthesiologists score may not accurately reflect their anaesthetic risk. While a comprehensive echocardiogram remains the gold standard for myxomatous mitral valve disease staging, referral to a veterinary cardiologist is often cost-prohibitive and might involve long waiting periods. This narrative review proposes a practical framework for pre-anaesthetic risk assessment and protocol selection in dogs with myxomatous mitral valve disease, integrating accessible diagnostic tools including physical examination, radiographic measurements (vertebral heart size and vertebral left atrial size), cardiac biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and point-of-care ultrasound. Recommended anaesthetic protocols are provided for different clinical scenarios ranging from cases with limited diagnostics through grey zone presentations to confirmed cardiomegaly, alongside structured approaches to managing intraoperative complications. This spectrum of care approach recognises that while specialist evaluation remains ideal, practical alternatives can guide safe anaesthetic management for this commonly encountered cardiac condition in companion dogs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.