ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2026
A multigene model for response stratification to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.
Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and verification of a prognostic nomogram model for triple-negative breast cancer patients with neoadjuvant therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Around half of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which is associated with a good outcome. Conversely, in patients with a poor response to NAC, there is a clear need to administer more effective therapeutic strategies. Accurate prediction of tumor response could enable the implementation of more personalized and effective treatment strategies. In this retrospective multicenter study, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of pre-NAC needle biopsies from TNBC patients treated between 2013 and 2022 were analyzed. Clinical, pathological, and transcriptomic data were combined in a prediction model, using a leave-one-out design, to predict the response to NAC, followed by external validation in an independent dataset. In total, 204 patients were included, comprising 87 good responders and 117 poor responders. A transcriptomic based prediction model showed that all samples but one clustered correctly in the good or the poor responder category. External validation showed an accuracy of 85% in predicting a good response to NAC, using a 31-gene signature. On the other hand, prediction of having a non-pCR was not substantial in this external cohort, since only 58% were predicted correctly. This study suggests that a 31-gene prediction model may help identify TNBC patients who are likely to achieve a pCR following NAC alone. These patients may not require therapeutic intensification, such as addition of immunotherapy, thereby minimizing exposure to unnecessary treatment-related toxicity and reducing associated healthcare costs. Nonetheless, further optimization and prospective validation are needed prior to moving towards clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.