Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41863144›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

The Dis-Engaged Patient? Chronic Interfacing in a Regime of Digital Health Convenience.

Benjamin Lipp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Benjamin LippDepartment of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4220-1532

Funding

European Commission 101031798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health technologies increasingly promise to alleviate the burden of chronic illness work by automating aspects of care. Rather than demanding constant self-monitoring, automated devices claim to deliver therapy with minimal involvement by patients. This article critically examines such claims through a study of Quell, a wearable neurostimulation device marketed for chronic pain relief in the United States. Drawing on interviews, user diaries and company documents, the article shows that rather than replacing illness work, automation reconfigures it. Patients remain deeply engaged in maintaining, tuning, deciphering and tracking their pain care, all while the device actively participates in it. This reflects a distinctly interfacial relationship between technology and people living with chronic pain. By conceptualising this relationship as chronic interfacing, the article argues that smart health technologies portend a shift away from neoliberal forms of governance. What emerges is a regime of digital health convenience, which partly dis-engages the patient from the chore of chronic living all while re-engaging them in managing the technological milieu required for this very delegation.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementPatient ParticipationWearable Electronic DevicesChronic DiseaseDigital HealthHumansUnited Statesautomationchronic painconveniencedigital healthinterfacing workneo‐liberalismneurotechnologywearable

Identifiers

PMID41863144
PMCPMC13005169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.