ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Spatial identification of areas suitable for other effective area-based conservation measures in the European Union.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial identification of areas suitable for other effective area-based conservation measures in the European Union.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although significant biodiversity has been safeguarded by protected areas (PAs), biodiversity trends continue downward. Within the frameworks of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the new EU Restoration Regulation (2024), conserving critical biodiversity areas is essential. One promising approach is other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs), which offer alternative pathways for in situ conservation. We identified sites across the EU that are not PAs but could contribute to conservation and be recognized as OECMs, and determined the potential contribution of these sites to biodiversity conservation. We partially applied the IUCN framework for OECM establishment across the entire EU with a focus on Greece and France. This framework is a three-step process (screening, consent, and full assessment), the full application of which requires data related to the governance and management regime of the area, long-term goals, and other site-specific information. Such data are typically available only at the site-based level. Hence, we based our analyses primarily on capturing biodiversity values within geographically defined areas based on freely available European data (e.g., landscape indices, habitats, and species statuses). We found that areas suitable for OECMs could cover up to 10% of European land and make substantial contributions to the EU's target of protecting 30% of its land by 2030. At the national level, we found that achieving biodiversity conservation outcomes with OECMs was uncertain. Accordingly, OECM confirmation must account for both the biodiversity value of proposed sites and the governance and management practices that support their effectiveness. Our approach highlights the potential of OECMs to enhance conservation efforts in support of a more resilient biodiversity landscape across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.