ArticleBiophysical journal2026
Readout of intrinsic and induced DNA shape by homeodomain transcription factor complexes.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Caveat emptor: predicting and modeling protein-DNA recognition and binding via machine-learning computational approaches.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Homeodomain transcription factors (TFs) recognize their DNA targets through both sequence-specific base contacts and readout of local DNA shape. Although intrinsic DNA structure is encoded by nucleotide sequence, it also undergoes protein-induced structural deformation upon binding. Yet, the interplay between intrinsic and protein-induced DNA shape remains unclear. Here, we dissect how these two readout modes determine binding specificity in a trimeric complex composed of the Drosophila Hox TF Sex combs reduced and its cofactors, Homothorax and Extradenticle. Guided by SELEX-seq data, we performed molecular dynamics simulations of this complex bound to sequences of varying binding affinities. We find that minor groove width reflects intrinsic DNA structure, whereas minor groove width fluctuations capture protein-induced stabilization and reshaping of the DNA. Within the trimeric complex, Homothorax reduces conformational fluctuations in an orientation- and sequence-dependent manner, with charged residues in its N-terminal arm playing key roles in DNA shape readout. This demonstrates that recognition involves a context-dependent balance between conformational selection and induced fit. We extend this analysis to two other homeodomain TFs, Distal-less and Engrailed, revealing that even closely related proteins produce distinct DNA shape signatures depending on sequence context. To translate these insights to novel sequences or mutant proteins, we evaluate whether AlphaFold 3 (AF3) can capture mutation-sensitive DNA shape readout. Although AF3 accurately reproduces wild-type structures, it struggles to predict how mutations or conformational dynamics alter DNA shape. To bridge this gap, we developed a hybrid pipeline integrating AlphaFold-based homology modeling, molecular dynamics simulations, and DeepPBS, a deep learning method for binding specificity prediction. This multiscale framework successfully captures the active modulation of DNA structure missed by AF3 alone, providing new insights into TF binding specificity and creating a roadmap for integrating deep learning and physics-based methods to study molecular mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.