ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026
Guiding Acute Heart Failure Treatment by Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Validation of a Score Combining Lung Ultrasound and Venous Excess Ultrasound.
Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ΔVExPLUs: prognostic value of integrating serial changes in VExUS score and lung ultrasound in acute decompensated heart failure.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Fluid Tolerance in Acute Kidney Injury: Is Point-of-Care Ultrasound the Future of Hemodynamic Assessment?Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) emerged as a promising tool to evaluate acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We propose a POCUS score combining lung and systemic congestion for ADHF assessment.
methodsPatients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) with a diagnosis of ADHF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% were included. Patient data and POCUS assessment were collected at baseline, after 72 hours, and at CICU discharge. A dynamic ultrasound congestion score (DUCS) incorporating modified venous excess ultrasound score and lung ultrasound was created. We evaluated DUCS by multivariate predictive models, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis.
resultsPatients (n = 109) were mostly male (67.8%), with a mean age of 64.5 years and mean LVEF of 25%. Delta DUCS (∆DUCS) from CICU admission up to 72 hours was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66, p = .009; ROC AUC = 0.76). DUCS at CICU discharge was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality and readmission (OR = 1.61, p = .001; ROC AUC = 0.77). Both ∆DUCS in 72 hours and DUCS at CICU discharge had good accuracy, in addition to adequate calibration metrics based on observed to expected ratio and performance. DUCS also improved NRI compared to a multivariate predictive model for in-hospital mortality (5.4%) and 30-day mortality and readmission (22.5%).
conclusionsDUCS was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality and of 30-day mortality and hospital readmission, representing a potentially useful tool to assess ADHF and treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.