ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026
Experimental evaluation of N-acetylcysteine against doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in rats.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nutritional Prevention of Oxidative Stress-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Pediatric Cardio-Oncology: Molecular Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives-A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDoxorubicin (DOX) is a widely used anthracycline antibiotic in the treatment of pediatric malignancies. However, its clinical application is significantly limited by its well-documented cardiotoxic side effects. The hypothesis of this study is that N-acetylcysteine (NAC), as an antioxidant agent, may reverse DOX-induced cardiotoxicity. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the potential protective role of NAC against DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in rat heart tissue in this experimental study.
methodsThirty rats were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10 each): control, DOX, and DOX + NAC. The control group received physiological saline via oral gavage at 0 and 24 h, followed by intraperitoneal saline at 48 h. The DOX group received saline at the same intervals, but received 20 mg/kg DOX intraperitoneally at 48 h. The treatment group received 140 mg/kg NAC orally at 0 and 24 h, followed by 20 mg/kg DOX intraperitoneally at 48 h.
resultsCompared to controls, the DOX group showed significantly increased malondialdehyde levels and decreased levels of antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase (p < 0.05). In the NAC-treated group, these values were comparable to controls. Histologically, the DOX group exhibited edema, inflammation, vacuolization, hemorrhage, necrosis, and myofibrillar disorganization, while these alterations were largely absent in the NAC group (p < 0.005).
conclusionIn our study, NAC did not produce significant biochemical improvement in DOX-damaged heart tissue but provided substantial histological protection against DOX toxicity. These findings highlight NAC as a promising agent for reducing DOX-induced cardiac toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.