ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2026
The quality and reliability of Kawasaki disease-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-platform content analysis using GQS, mDISCERN, and JAMA benchmarks.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKawasaki disease (KD) represents the leading cause of acquired heart disease in children, with timely diagnosis and treatment being crucial to prevent severe coronary complications. The widespread use of short-video platforms such as TikTok and Bilibili has made them increasingly important sources of health information for the public. However, the quality and reliability of KD-related content on these platforms remain largely unassessed. This study aimed to evaluate the educational quality and informational reliability of short videos about KD on TikTok and Bilibili, two of the most popular social media platforms in China.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the top 100 videos retrieved for KD on each platform. A total of 186 videos were assessed using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), and JAMA benchmark criteria. Uploaders were categorized as professionals or non-professionals. Video characteristics, engagement metrics, and content coverage were analyzed.
resultsOverall quality was suboptimal (median scores: GQS = 2, mDISCERN = 2, JAMA = 2). Videos from professionals scored significantly higher than those from non-professionals (p < 0.001). TikTok videos were shorter but had higher engagement and GQS scores than Bilibili videos (p < 0.001). Content coverage was skewed: clinical manifestations were discussed in > 80% of videos, while prognosis and prevention were covered in < 25%. Engagement metrics showed negligible correlation with quality scores.
conclusionsKD-related short videos on popular Chinese platforms exhibit notable quality deficiencies and content gaps. Incomplete or low-quality online information may delay caregiver recognition and timely medical evaluation, potentially increasing the risk of coronary complications in children with KD. Although professional involvement is associated with better quality, overall reliability remains limited. These findings highlight the need for improved content governance and tailored strategies for accurate health communication on social media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.