ArticleBioData mining2026
Profile-guided Hybrid Approach for block-wise missing data handling in multi-omics: a breast cancer case study.
Article in BioData mining, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBlock-wise missingness is a common challenge in multi-omics data, hindering the development of robust and generalizable machine learning models, as real-world cohorts rarely contain complete omic profiles. Many current methods either discard incomplete samples, use available-case models that need retraining when faced with new missingness patterns, or depend on full-dataset imputation, which can risk biological integrity and model stability.
methodsUsing a complete four-omics breast cancer dataset (705 patients, 1,937 features), up to 60% block-wise missingness was simulated across five clinically relevant scenarios and used to compare four strategies for handling missing data: an Imputation-Based model, Dynamic and Exhaustive Available-Case approaches, and the proposed Hybrid Approach that combines profile-guided modeling with selective, test-time imputation. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1 score, balanced accuracy, inference time, and variability across 15 random seeds, with significance assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsThe Hybrid Approach consistently achieved the strongest and most stable performance. Relative to the complete-data baseline, it reached an average accuracy of 103.7%, F1 score of 123.3%, and balanced accuracy of 104.8%, outperforming the Imputation-Based method and matching or exceeding both Dynamic and Exhaustive Available-Case strategies. Statistical testing confirmed that these improvements were significant. The method also demonstrated fast and predictable inference (~ 2 s) and an average total runtime of ~ 49 s per configuration—nearly three times faster than the Exhaustive approach (~ 124 s)—while maintaining high reproducibility and low variance across seeds, a key indicator of computational stability.
conclusionBy selectively combining lightweight imputation with profile-specific modeling, the Hybrid Approach provides a computationally efficient and statistically robust solution for block-wise missing data. This framework offers a generalizable strategy for multi-omics data mining, and lays the foundation for future systems incorporating cross-profile learning and advanced imputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.