ArticlePatient safety in surgery2026
Identified practice gaps and opportunities in anesthesia safety across 14 Arab countries: a multicenter study.
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSafe anesthesia is fundamental to safe surgery and depends on facility readiness, team behaviors, and consistent adherence to safety standards such as the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist. Across the Arab region, variability in workforce capacity, equipment and supplies, and checklist implementation may contribute to uneven safety performance, yet multicountry data describing readiness and routine anesthesia safety practices remain limited. We therefore assessed facility readiness and clinicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported safety practices, and examined how checklist use and perceived barriers relate to these domains across fourteen Arab countries.
methodsWe conducted a multicountry online cross-sectional survey of anesthesia team members working in hospital operating theatres and procedural anesthesia locations across fourteen Arab countries. The survey evaluated facility readiness, knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported safety practices, and captured frequency of surgical safety checklist use and perceived barriers to safe anesthesia practice.
resultsOverall, facility readiness and participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported safety practices were generally high; however, routine checklist use was not universal. Commonly reported barriers included understaffing and workload pressure, as well as financial constraints affecting equipment and supplies. More frequent checklist use was associated with better safety-related performance across assessed domains, whereas a higher barrier burden was associated with poorer readiness and self-reported practice.
conclusionsAlthough anesthesia safety performance was generally favorable across surveyed settings, important implementation and systems gaps remain, particularly in routine checklist use and resource-related constraints. Strengthening workforce capacity, ensuring access to essential equipment and supplies, and embedding meaningful, high-fidelity checklist use may help reduce residual safety gaps and support safer anesthesia care across diverse hospitals in the Arab region.
trial registrationNot applicable. (This study is an observational cross-sectional survey and did not involve prospective assignment to a health-related intervention.)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.