ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026
Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-based therapies for autism spectrum disorder: emerging evidence and clinical prospects.
Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal stem cells and derived extracellular vesicles in major respiratory diseases: from multifaceted molecular mechanisms to clinical perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition with rising global prevalence. Current management strategies predominantly address behavioral symptoms rather than core neurobiological dysfunctions, highlighting an unmet need for mechanism-targeted interventions. MAIN BODY: This review comprehensively evaluates the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC)-based therapies for ASD. We discuss the multi-faceted mechanisms through which MSCs and their secretomes (particularly MSC-EVs or MSC-exos) may ameliorate ASD pathophysiology, including modulation of neuroinflammation via anti-inflammatory cytokine and adenosine signaling, promotion of neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity through neurotrophic factors (e.g., BDNF, GDNF), restoration of gut-brain axis communication, and enhancement of cerebral angiogenesis via VEGF. We synthesize a decade of preclinical evidence (2015–2025) from various ASD animal models (e.g., BTBR, VPA-induced, MIA, Shank3B KO), detailing improvements in social behavior, repetitive actions, and cognitive function following MSC or MSC-derived product administration via routes such as intravenous, intranasal, or intracerebroventricular delivery. Furthermore, we analyze all registered early-phase clinical trials (Phase I and II, n = 9 as of March 2026), comparing different MSC sources, their safety profiles, and preliminary efficacy outcomes. Key challenges are examined, including heterogeneity in trial design, small sample sizes, the predominance of open-label studies, and the gap between promising preclinical results and established clinical translation.
conclusionsMSC-based therapy represents a transformative, pathophysiology-informed strategy for ASD. While preclinical and early clinical data are encouraging, significant hurdles remain in standardization, dose optimization, and demonstration of long-term efficacy and safety. We emphasize the necessity for rigorous, large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to advance this promising therapeutic approach toward clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.