Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862937›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2026

A framework policy analysis of single-dose HPV vaccination adoption in East Africa: a rapid review.

Grace Umutesi, Bryan J Weiner, Teresa Jewell, Saidi Kapiga, Jeff Lane, Nelly R Mugo, Ruanne V Barnabas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A Comparative Policy Analysis of HPV Vaccination Guidelines: Actors, Context, Content, and Process Across Eight Countries.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Grace UmutesiDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. gumutesi@uw.edu.
Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Teresa JewellDepartment of Interprofessional Education in Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Saidi KapigaMwanza Intervention Trials Unit (MITU), National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Jeff LaneDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Nelly R MugoDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center, 3980 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Ruanne V BarnabasDivision of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a global public health problem. While HPV vaccination effectively prevents cervical cancer, vaccination coverage remains low in low -and middle-income countries (LMICs) where around 94% of cervical cancer-related deaths occur. To improve coverage and accelerate progress toward achieving cervical cancer elimination, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that countries switch to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule in 2022. Despite strong evidence of the health and economic benefits of a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule, its adoption has varied across countries. We sought to rapidly review existing evidence to assess the “how” of policy reform on HPV vaccination, leveraging a policy analysis of single-dose HPV vaccination adoption in three East African countries. We used the Health Policy Triangle Framework (HPF) to compile key considerations that led to the adoption of single-dose HPV vaccination in Ethiopia, Uganda, and Tanzania. Relevant articles from peer-reviewed journals and grey literature published up to December 2024 were selected using pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and summarized using a rapid qualitative analysis approach guided by the HPF. Twenty-four articles from academic and grey literature were examined. Beyond context-specific aspects, a few common themes emerged across the three countries. Political will focused on addressing cervical cancer as a public health problem, and it was crucial to prioritize the revision of the HPV vaccination policy. The policy revision on the HPV vaccination schedule was undertaken, building on existing evidence and the WHO endorsement. Additionally, the availability of key evidence on the magnitude of this public health problem (eg: burden of the disease), the potential benefit of a single-dose schedule (efficacy, and the economic impact) played an important role in the policy revision process. At the national level, National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) that provided evidence-based guidance to policy-makers were central to the single-dose decision-making process. Our findings highlighted key considerations for the policy revision process in three East African countries, which could inform strategic policy decisions in these countries and comparable settings.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPolicy MakingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationAfrica, EasternFemaleHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansImmunization ScheduleUgandaPapillomavirus VaccinesCervical cancer eliminationEast AfricaEthiopiaHPV vaccinationImplementation sciencePolicySingle-dose scheduleSub-Saharan AfricaTanzaniaUganda

Identifiers

PMID41862937
PMCPMC13126985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.