Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41862933›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2026

Practitioner perspectives on implementing a quality improvement intervention for telephone-based therapy in NHS Talking Therapies: a qualitative process evaluation study.

Cintia Faija, Judith Gellatly, Kelly Rushton, Penny Bee, Helen Brooks

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cintia FaijaDepartment of Primary Care & Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
Judith GellatlyDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. judith.l.gellatly@manchester.ac.uk.
Kelly RushtonDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Penny BeeDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Helen BrooksDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the factors that shape implementation processes is fundamental to improving outcomes and applicability of interventions. This study reports on part of a process evaluation nested within a cluster randomised controlled trial. It aimed to explore professional perspectives on the challenges and lessons learnt during implementation of a multilevel (patient, practitioner, and service-level) quality improvement intervention developed to enhance telephone-delivered psychological interventions in NHS Talking Therapies services for anxiety and depression (NHS TTad).

methodsQualitative semi-structured interviews with twenty-eight professionals recruited from nine NHS TTad services were conducted. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) were used to inform data collection and analysis. Template analysis was used to exploit the structured approaches of CFIR and NPT whilst retaining the flexibility of thematic analysis to examine the factors perceived to affect implementation.

resultsFour themes were interpreted from the data: (1) Perceived value of the intervention and its distinctiveness from routine practice; (2) Implementation climate and variation in uptake across services and practitioners' telephone experience; (3) Need for implementation clarity and leadership support within existing constraints; and (4) Planning for monitoring and continuous improvement throughout implementation. Supportive leadership, planning and execution were important factors, supporting implementation into routine practice. Team members valued the protected time they had whilst in receipt of the intervention, reporting they could reflect on current practices, strengthen relationships and engage in collaborative feedback which supported co-creation of quality improvement plans to enhance telephone-delivered low-intensity psychological interventions. Analysis also revealed limited changes were implemented and sustained over time.

conclusionsSuccessful implementation and sustainability of the intervention across study sites was dependent on active leadership engagement, sufficient time and resources to build a shared understanding of work processes. Collective recognition of the value of the intervention by team members and clear understanding of what changes are needed, who is responsible for them, and the timeline for implementation was considered vital and may have implications for successful implementation nationally in Talking Therapy services. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly influenced the context of implementation, accelerating the adoption of telephone services but also reshaped service priorities and challenges during the study period.

trial registrationISRCTN22583714, Registration date: 01/09/2021.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDepressionQuality ImprovementFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental Health TeletherapyQualitative ResearchState MedicineTelephoneAnxietyCFIRDepressionImplementationNPTPsychological therapyQualitativeTalking therapiesTelephone therapy

Identifiers

PMID41862933
PMCPMC13126786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.