ReviewJournal of biological engineering2026
Are we there yet? The road to faster and more efficient CAR T cell manufacturing.
Review in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of CAR-T Therapy: Functional Engineering, Manufacturing Innovation, and Future In Vivo Strategies.Cancer science · 2026Review
- Applications of synthetic biology in biomedicine.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Why CAR T cell therapy fails in renal cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A CAR/CD19 Jurkat cell model for bioprocess screening and expansion: potential use for CAR-T cells production.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have achieved clinical success in autologous treatment of hematological malignancies. However, their broader application remains limited. Beyond the biological challenges associated with the immunosuppressive microenvironment of solid tumors and the graft-versus-host disease risks inherent to allogeneic settings, the widespread adoption of CAR T cells is hindered by the high costs, long and complex vein-to-vein timelines and variability in product quality. Rapid CAR T cell manufacturing has emerged as an alternative paradigm that prioritizes shortened production workflows and preservation of naïve and stem-like T cell phenotypes with superior in vivo expansion, persistence and anti-tumor efficacy. This review examines rapid CAR T cell manufacturing from a bioprocess engineering perspective, focusing on how critical process parameters can be explored to shape CAR T cell phenotype and function within shortened timelines. We highlight key technological enablers, including automation, microfluidic systems, process analytical technologies, artificial intelligence-driven bioprocess control, quality control methodologies as well as safety considerations unique to accelerated workflows. Emerging CAR T cell manufacturing models, such as point-of-care production and in vivo CAR T cells generation, are also discussed. These insights outline engineering strategies to enable faster, more consistent and clinically effective CAR T cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.