ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Interpretable machine learning model predicts postoperative complications after thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor surgery: a multicenter study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative complications of mediastinal tumors significantly impact patients’ quality of life and long-term outcomes; however, a notable gap in the development of predictive tools for their occurrence remains. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine-learning model predicting thoracoscopic resection complications.
methodsPatients who underwent thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection at Southwest Hospital (January 2014 to April 2024) were retrospectively enrolled (n = 302) and randomly divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. An additional 21 patients from Banan Hospital who underwent the same procedure (October 2023 to April 2024) were included as an external test set. The primary endpoint was postoperative complications within 90 days, with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥Ⅱ) as the secondary endpoint. Fifteen predictive models were constructed using three feature selection methods and five machine learning algorithms. Model performance was assessed by AUC, and interpretability was analyzed using SHAP. The optimal model was selected based on the highest AUC values in validation set.
resultsAmong the 302 patients in the main center, postoperative complications were observed in 92 (43.6%) in the training set and 40 (44.0%) in the test set. The Lasso-random forest model performed best, incorporating features like maximum tumor diameter, past medical history, surgical approach, myasthenia gravis, and hypertension (ranked by SHAP-derived feature importance). It achieved an AUC of 0.799 (95% CI: 0.700–0.897), showing robust discrimination and classification ability.
conclusionThe first web-based machine learning predictive model was developed to guide perioperative management and intraoperative decision-making for high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.